pinrake2

Evolution Korea The financial crisis that struck Asia forced a major reappraisal of the old system of government-business alliances and the public management of private risks. In Korea this meant a shift in the model of development. In a controversial decision the South Korean government has asked publishers of textbooks to ignore calls for removing examples of evolution in high school science textbooks. This includes the evidence supporting the evolution of horses and the bird ancestor Archaeopteryx. 1. Evolution and Religion A South Korean creationist group has convinced textbook publishers to remove evidence of evolution from high school science texts. The move was a result of a campaign by the Society for Textbook Revise (STR) which is an affiliate of the Korea Association for Creation Research, which wants to rid biology textbooks of “atheist materialism.” The STR claims that such materialistic views create a negative image for students, and could lead to their eventual loss of faith. Scientists from all over the world expressed concerns when the STR campaign made headlines. Jae Choe, evolutionary biologist at Ewha Womans University, Seoul, complained in an open letter to Nature's editor that South Korea had succumbed to religious prejudice. He was backed by colleagues from around the country who gathered into a group called Evolution Korea to organize an anti-textbook petition. Some researchers are also concerned about the possibility that the STR campaign will spread to other regions of the world where the spread of creationism is increasing. The letter to Nature warned that the anti-evolutionist movement will intensify pressure for revisions to textbooks in other countries, especially those with large Christian and Muslim populations. The South Korean culture is especially strong in the debate over evolution. 26 percent of the country's citizens belong to one of the religious groups, and most adhere to Christianity or Buddhism. Many Koreans also adhere to Ch'ondogyo – the philosophy based on Confucian principles that emphasizes harmony in the social, personal self-cultivation and self-respect. Ch'ondogyo teaches that the human being is one with Hanulnim the God of Sun, and that divine blessings are achievable through good works. All of this has created fertile ground for the spread of creationism. Numerous studies have found that students with a religious background to be more hesitant to learn about evolution than those who don't. The underlying causes are not evident. One reason is that students with a religious background tend not to be as knowledgeable about scientific theories and concepts, which makes them more susceptible to the influence of creationists. Another reason could be that students who have religious backgrounds might view evolution as an idea that is atheistic, making them less comfortable. 2. Evolution and Science In recent times, the scientific community has been concerned about anti-evolution initiatives in schools. A survey conducted in 2009 revealed that nearly 40 percent of Americans believed that biological evolution was not true and that it would conflict their religious beliefs. Despite the success of creationism in some states, many scientists believe that the best method to combat this inclination is not to be actively involved in with it, but rather educate the public about the evidence that supports evolution. Scientists are responsible to teach their students science that includes the theory of evolution. They must also educate the public on the process of scientific research and the way in which knowledge is confirmed. They must also explain that scientific theories are often challenged and re-examined. However, misconceptions about nature and purpose of scientific research can fuel anti-evolution views. For 에볼루션 무료 바카라 , many people confuse the term “theory” with the common meaning of the word, which is a hunch or a guess. In the field of science, however, an hypothesis is rigorously tested and empirical evidence is used to prove it. A theory that is tested and observed repeatedly becomes a scientific principal. The debate on evolution theory is a great chance to discuss the importance of scientific methodology and its limits. It is crucial that people understand that science does not provide answers to questions about life's purpose or meaning, but rather allows living things to grow and adapt. Moreover, a well-rounded education should cover all the major scientific fields, including evolutionary biology. This is crucial because a lot of jobs and decisions require people understand how science operates. The vast majority scientists in the world agree that humans have changed through time. A recent study that predicted adults' opinions of the consensus around this issue found that those with higher education levels and knowledge of science were more likely to believe that there is a broad agreement between scientists regarding human evolution. The people with more religious beliefs and less science-based knowledge are more likely to disapprove. It is essential that teachers stress the importance of understanding this consensus so that people can make informed decisions regarding health care, energy usage and other issues of policy. 3. Evolution and Culture A close relative to mainstream evolutionary theory, cultural evolution explores the many ways that humans and other species learn from and with one another. Researchers in this field employ explanation tools and models that are adapted from evolutionary theorists and go back to human prehistory to determine the origins of culture. This method also acknowledges the distinction between traits that are cultural and biological. Cultural traits can be acquired slowly while biological traits are typically acquired simultaneously (in the case of sexual species after fertilization). In the end, the acquisition of one cultural trait can influence the development of another. In Korea, the adoption of Western elements of style in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century was the result of an elaborate sequence of events. One of the most significant was the arrival of Japanese occupation forces who introduced Western hairstyles and styles of clothing to Korean society. Then, when Japan left Korea in the 1930s, a few of these trends began to reverse. At the close of World War II, Korea was once again united but this time under the rule of the Choson dynasty. Today, Korea is an economic and political power. Despite the financial crisis of recent the economy of Korea has been growing at a steady pace over the last decade. It is expected to keep this trend going in the near future. The current government is faced with many challenges. The government's inability to formulate a coherent strategy to tackle the current economic crisis is one the biggest obstacles. The crisis has exposed the weaknesses in the country's policies and its reliance on exports and foreign investment that may not last. The crisis has shaken the confidence of investors. This means that the government must reconsider its approach and find other ways to boost the domestic demand. It also needs to revamp the incentive monitoring, monitoring, and discipline systems that are in place to guarantee the stability of the financial system. This chapter offers a number of scenarios of how the Korean economy could grow after the crisis. 4. Evolution and Education The challenge for evolution educators is how to teach evolutionary concepts that are appropriate for different levels of development and ages. Teachers, for instance, must be aware of the diversity of religions in their classrooms and create an environment that students who have religious and secular views are comfortable with learning about evolution. Teachers should also be able to identify common misconceptions regarding evolution and know how to correct them in the classroom. Teachers must also have easy access to the many resources that can be used to teach evolution. In this context, Thinking Evolutionarily Convocation played a significant role in bringing evolutionary researchers and educators from different sectors to discuss best methods for teaching Evolution. Participants included representatives from scientific societies, educational researchers, officials of government funding agencies, and curriculum developers. The convergence of various stakeholders led to the development of the common recommendations that will form the basis for any future actions. One important recommendation is that the subject of evolution should be incorporated in all science curricula at any level. National Science Education Standards (NRC) that call for the integration of evolution across all life sciences with a progression that is developmentally appropriate, are a method to achieve this goal. Furthermore, a new publication from the NRC offers guidance to schools on how to integrate evolution into the science curriculum. Several studies have found that a more comprehensive teaching of evolution is associated with higher levels of student understanding and belief in the existence of evolution. It is difficult to quantify the causal effects of evolution in the classroom since school curricula don't change on a regular basis and are affected by the timing of the state board of education and gubernatorial election. To overcome this problem I employ a longitudinal data set that lets me control for fixed state and year effects and the individual-level variation in teacher beliefs regarding evolution. Teachers who are more comfortable in teaching evolution have less internal barriers. This is in line with the hypothesis that more confident faculty are less likely to avoid teaching about evolution in the classroom, and could be more inclined to employ strategies like a reconciliatory method that is known to boost the acceptance of undergraduate students of evolution.